Difference between revisions of "File Transfer Protocol"

From FileZilla Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(jmGbRStST)
(jZkeOMmqaaqw)
Line 1: Line 1:
-720p HDMI output -An aeclhetisatly nice software (Zune 4.0 interface is very pretty to look at, not a dull spreadsheet like iTunes) -An aeclhetisatly nice device OS (Artist pictures and info float around while playing a song, it's cool) -OLED screen (brighter, more vibrant than LCD) -Free HD radio -Radio  tagging  (If you like a song you hear on the radio,  tag  it to add it to your cart for download) -A feature called  Smart DJ  that functions identically to the online radio service  Pandora  but has no limitations on skips and allows you to rate/download songs you like. Requires a ZunePass though.  -XBOX Live integration  -An advanced nVidia Tegra Chip (A couple of graphically-intense 3D games are coming out this fall, like Burnout: Ferrari Edition) -On-demand music (play music online with your Zune HD, don't need to download it to your hard drive) Again, the Zune HD is just simply amazing. With the Nvidia Tegra chip and highly capable processor, the potential for this device is endless. The Zune HD is supposed to be a portable gaming platform to compete head-to-head with the Nintendo DS and PSP brands. I'm excited to see Burnout: Ferrari Edition on it this fall. I'm also looking forward to see more apps as well. Could this device take significant market share from Apple's iPod Touch? With the right marketing to increase public awareness of this product, yes it definitely can. Every large monopolizing entity like Kmart, GM, and even Apple will dominate a market completely for some period of time. However, times change and something better always comes along. Is this Zune HD the better alternative to the iPod? With some more releases in the app store and updates, it clearly will be. The question is will Apple change and copy the Zune's features including the Zune Pass? I don't know, we'll see. The Zune Pass will clearly become the new standard of digital music services and the $1-per-song marketplace model will not be competitive much longer. ***UPDATE*** I've been getting a lot of comments on my review saying that the Zune's HD radio does not compensate for the lack of online radio services found on the iPod Touch (such as Pandora). I believe I already said in my review that with some more app development the Zune HD will be a strong competitor to the iPod Touch. However, who in the world needs Pandora if you have a Zune Pass? Your Zune will learn your musical tastes and give you recommendations. You can download/stream all the music you want without limits. But if you like Pandora, I suggest playing with the Zune's  Smart DJ . It will create a streaming playlist of songs based on your overall musical tastes or play specifically based on a certain artist. I also forgot to add the Zune HD does not have an external speaker. If that's a super-important feature to you, the iPod Touch may suit you for now. However you can always get headphone couplers or battery-powered mini-speakers to remedy this. ***UPDATE*** The new apps on the Zune released this fall include some amazing 3D games. They look just as good (if not better) than what you would find on a PSP or Nintendo DS. Among these games are Van's Sk8, Burnout: Ferrari Edition, Audiosurf Tilt, and many others. Twitter has been released as well and Facebook should follow soon. I have no complaints about the Zune after owning it for a few months. I'm convinced the Zune brand provides the best music experience service ever created. ***UPDATE*** October 2010 It's been a
+
much of your logic would apply to Microsoft in the 90s. look where they are at now: still a force to be reckoned with, but nbdooy thinks they are the future. people were wrong in the 90s thinking that startups would simply either remain small or got bought by microsoft, or be out-competed by the resources at microsoft. I don't see our time be any different. I agree that ideas are not what makes startups successful. indeed ideas are probably next to worthless, just try to sell one.one mechanisms that startups will out-compete large companies is speed. or call it efficiency, rate of innovation  it all comes down to the fact that, as an organization grows in size, bureaucracy grows exponentially. (at the rate of n-squared in fact.) this acts almost like a fundamental law. economy of scale used to compensate for this, but on the internet, economy of scale can be achieved by a very small team (craiglist has <20 employees, I heard). as a heuristic: the thing with competing with formidable forces like Microsoft (and now Apple and Goolge) is not to do a frontal assault. You can't say I am going to devleop a new operating system, or a better search engine (although even on search engines, there are interesting ideas being tried). One way around it is to define a super problem that encompasses the problem which the large companies have an advantage. (super as in "super set"). the way to beat MS is not to develop a better OS, but is to make applications server-based, or cloud-computing  such that OS itself becomes an obsolete idea. We'll just all be connected 24hr via broadband with simple terminals that has no OS.btw, none these are my original ideas. I just read from tech blogs  welcome discussion, ideas, pointing out my errors.

Revision as of 05:22, 23 March 2012

much of your logic would apply to Microsoft in the 90s. look where they are at now: still a force to be reckoned with, but nbdooy thinks they are the future. people were wrong in the 90s thinking that startups would simply either remain small or got bought by microsoft, or be out-competed by the resources at microsoft. I don't see our time be any different. I agree that ideas are not what makes startups successful. indeed ideas are probably next to worthless, just try to sell one.one mechanisms that startups will out-compete large companies is speed. or call it efficiency, rate of innovation it all comes down to the fact that, as an organization grows in size, bureaucracy grows exponentially. (at the rate of n-squared in fact.) this acts almost like a fundamental law. economy of scale used to compensate for this, but on the internet, economy of scale can be achieved by a very small team (craiglist has <20 employees, I heard). as a heuristic: the thing with competing with formidable forces like Microsoft (and now Apple and Goolge) is not to do a frontal assault. You can't say I am going to devleop a new operating system, or a better search engine (although even on search engines, there are interesting ideas being tried). One way around it is to define a super problem that encompasses the problem which the large companies have an advantage. (super as in "super set"). the way to beat MS is not to develop a better OS, but is to make applications server-based, or cloud-computing such that OS itself becomes an obsolete idea. We'll just all be connected 24hr via broadband with simple terminals that has no OS.btw, none these are my original ideas. I just read from tech blogs welcome discussion, ideas, pointing out my errors.