Difference between revisions of "Network Configuration"

From FileZilla Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Undo revision 7623 by 90.3.80.106 (Talk) cos translated to French (WTF?))
Line 2: Line 2:
 
This documentation describes the history of the FTP protocol and how some aspects of the protocol work. Read it carefully, it will save you a lot of trouble setting up FTP.
 
This documentation describes the history of the FTP protocol and how some aspects of the protocol work. Read it carefully, it will save you a lot of trouble setting up FTP.
  
Contexte == ==
+
== Background ==
  
Un aperçu de l'arrière-plan historique et technique du protocole FTP. Pour des informations détaillées en profondeur voir [[File Transfer Protocol spécifications |File Transfer Protocol spécifications ]].
+
An overview of the historical and technical background of the FTP protocol. For detailed in-depth information see [[File Transfer Protocol|specifications]].
  
=== Historique ===
+
=== Historical Background ===
  
Dans le monde vivant rapide de l'Internet, le File Transfer Protocol n'est pas vieux, il est ancienne. Les premières versions du protocole de remonter aussi loin que 1971, les normes en vigueur étant de 1985. Le protocole peut-être même plus que vous!
+
In the fast living world of the internet, the File Transfer Protocol is not just old, it's ancient. Early drafts of the protocol go back as far as 1971, with the current specifications being from 1985. The protocol might even be older than you!
  
À l'époque, l'Internet était principalement utilisé par les universités et centres de recherche. La communauté est petite, de nombreux utilisateurs se connaissaient et tous ont collaboré ensemble. L'Internet a été un match amical, le lieu de confiance. De sécurité n'était pas une préoccupation.
+
Back then, the Internet was mainly used by universities and research centers. The community was small, many users knew each other and all were collaborating together. The internet was a friendly, trusting place. Security was not a concern.
  
Depuis lors, beaucoup de choses ont changé. L'Internet est aujourd'hui partout, avec des millions d'utilisateurs de communiquer entre eux de différentes manières.
+
Since then, a lot has changed. The Internet is now ubiquitous, with millions of users communicating with each other in many different ways.
L'Internet est maintenant un endroit hostile. La disponibilité et l'ouverture a attiré des utilisateurs malveillants qui exploitent les limites de conception, implémentation incomplète, bugs et l'inexpérience des autres utilisateurs. Une société de logiciels bien connus situés à Redmond, WA certainement joué un rôle dans ce domaine.
+
The internet is now a hostile place. The availability and openness has attracted malicious users who exploit design limitations, incomplete implementations, bugs and the inexperience of other users. A well-known software company located in Redmond, WA certainly played a part in this.
  
Plusieurs tentatives ont été faites pour résoudre ces problèmes:
+
Several attempts have been made to address these problems:
* [Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation NAT] (Network Address Translation) routeurs. Bon nombre des hôtes et des routeurs sur Internet utilisent le [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4 IPv4 Protocole]. Le nombre d'hôtes connectés à l'Internet est à la limite de conception IPV4 pour le nombre d'adresses ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6 IPv6] est conçu pour soulager cette). routeurs NAT permet de multiples systèmes sur un réseau local pour se connecter au monde extérieur avec une adresse IP externe.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation NAT] (Network Address Translation) routers. Many of the hosts and routers on the internet use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4 IPv4] protocol. The number of hosts connected to the internet is reaching IPV4's design limit for the number of addresses([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6 IPv6] is designed to relieve this). NAT routers allow multiple systems within a LAN to connect to the outside world with one external IP address.
* [Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_firewall pare-feu personnels] essayer de protéger les ordinateurs personnels contre les attaques par des utilisateurs malveillants.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_firewall Personal firewalls] try to protect personal computers from attacks by malicious users.
  
Malheureusement, les deux NAT et pare-feu personnels conflit avec FTP le plus souvent. Pour aggraver les choses, certains d'entre eux ont même des défauts eux-mêmes, provoquant des problèmes supplémentaires concernant FTP.
+
Unfortunately, both NAT and personal firewalls conflict with FTP more often than not. To make things worse, some of them even have flaws themselves, causing additional problems regarding FTP.
=== === Information technique
+
=== Technical background ===
  
Ce qui distingue de la plupart des protocoles FTP autre est l'utilisation de connexions secondaires pour les transferts de fichiers. Si vous vous connectez à un serveur FTP, vous établissez la soi-disant''''connexion de contrôle, sur laquelle les commandes FTP et leurs réponses sont transférés. Pour transférer un fichier ou un répertoire, le client envoie une commande au cours de la connexion de contrôle pour établir la connexion''''de données.
+
What distinguishes FTP from most other protocols is the use of secondary connections for file transfers. If you connect to an FTP server, you establish the so-called ''control connection'', over which the FTP commands and their replies are transferred. In order to transfer a file or a directory listing, the client sends some command over the control connection to establish the ''data connection''.
  
Cette connexion de données peut être établie de deux manières différentes, appelé mode actif et en mode passif.
+
This data connection can be established in two different ways, called active mode and passive mode.
  
En mode passif, qui est le deuxième mode, le client envoie la commande PASV sur le serveur et le serveur répond avec une adresse. Le client émet alors une commande pour transférer un fichier ou pour obtenir une liste des répertoires et établit une connexion secondaire par rapport à l'adresse renvoyée par le serveur.
+
In passive mode, which is the recommended mode, the client sends the PASV command to the server, and the server responds with an address. The client then issues a command to transfer a file or to get a directory listing and establishes a secondary connection to the address returned by the server.
  
En mode actif, le client ouvre un socket sur la machine locale, et indique son adresse au serveur en utilisant la commande PORT. Une fois que le client émet une commande pour transférer un fichier ou une liste, le serveur se connecte à l'adresse fournie par le client.
+
In active mode, the client opens a socket on the local machine, and tells its address to the server using the PORT command. Once the client issues a command to transfer a file or listing, the server will connect to the address provided by the client.
  
Dans les deux cas, le fichier réel ou annonce est ensuite transféré sur la connexion de données.
+
In both cases, the actual file or listing is then transferred over the data connection.
  
En général, l'établissement de connexions sortantes nécessite moins de configuration sur les routeurs / pare-feu impliqués que d'établir les connexions entrantes. En mode passif, la connexion est sortante sur le côté client et entrant sur le côté serveur. En mode actif cependant, les rôles sont inversés: La connexion de données entrants sur le côté client et sortant sur le côté serveur.
+
In general, establishing outgoing connections requires less configuration on the routers/firewalls involved than establishing incoming connections. In passive mode, the connection is outgoing on the client side and incoming on the server side. In active mode however, the roles are reversed: The data connection is incoming on the client side and outgoing on the server side.
S'il vous plaît noter que cela fait seulement une différence pour l'établissement de connexion: Une fois la connexion établie, il obtient des données peut être utilisée pour des mises ou des téléchargements.
+
Please note that this only makes a difference for connection establishment: Once the data connection gets established it can be used for either up- or downloads.
  
Une configuration réseau commun pourrait ressembler à ceci:
+
A common network setup might look like this:
  
[[Image: FTP1.png | center]]
+
[[Image:FTP1.png|center]]
  
  
Ainsi, en mode passif, le routeur et pare-feu sur le côté serveur doit être configuré pour accepter les connexions entrantes et transmettre. Sur le côté client toutefois, que les connexions sortantes doivent être autorisés, ce qui sera déjà le cas la plupart du temps.
+
So in passive mode, the router and firewall on the server side need to be configured to accept and forward incoming connections. On the client side however, only outgoing connections have to be allowed, which will already be the case most of the time.
  
Analogues en mode actif, le routeur et pare-feu sur le côté client doivent être configuré pour accepter les connexions entrantes et l'avant. Apparemment, sur le côté serveur, que les connexions sortantes doivent être autorisés.
+
Analogous in active mode, the router and firewall on the client side need to be configured to accept and forward incoming connections. Apparently on the server side, only outgoing connections have to be allowed.
  
Comme, en général un serveur fournit un service pour de nombreux utilisateurs, il est beaucoup plus facile de configurer le routeur et pare-feu sur le côté serveur une fois pour le mode passif, que de configurer le routeur du client / pare-feu pour chaque client en mode actif. C'est pourquoi le mode passif est recommandé.
+
Since usually one server provides a service for many users, it is far easier to just configure the router and firewall on the server side once for passive mode, than to configure the client's router/firewall for each individual client in active mode. That is why passive mode is recommended.
  
routeurs NAT ==== ====
+
==== NAT routers ====
  
Pour la plupart des utilisateurs du haut débit, il y aura un NAT (Network Address Translation) routeur entre son ordinateur et l'Internet. Ce routeur NAT peut être un dispositif autonome routeur (peut-être un routeur sans fil), ou il pourrait être intégré à un modem DSL ou modem câble. Dans un environnement NAT, tous les systèmes de derrière le routeur NAT forme un''Local Area Network (LAN)''et chaque système dans le réseau local a une adresse IP locale (reconnaissable que quatre petits nombres séparés par des points). Le routeur NAT lui-même a une adresse IP locale ainsi. En outre, le routeur NAT a également une adresse IP externe en vertu de laquelle il est connu de l'Internet. Les adresses IP internes ne sont valables que dans le LAN, d'un système distant auquel ils n'auraient pas de sens.
+
For most broadband users, there will be a NAT (Network Address Translation) router between their computer and the internet. This NAT router may be a standalone router device (perhaps a wireless router), or it could be built into a DSL modem or Cable modem. In a NAT environment, all systems behind the NAT router form a ''Local Area Network (LAN)'' and each system in the LAN has a local IP address (recognizable as four small numbers separated by dots). The NAT router itself has a local IP address as well. In addition to that, the NAT router also has an external IP address under which it is known to the internet. The internal IP addresses are only valid inside the LAN, for a remote system they would make no sense.
Exemple:
+
Example:
  
[[Image: FTP2.png | center]]
+
[[Image:FTP2.png|center]]
  
  
Supposons qu'un serveur est derrière un routeur NAT. Imaginez ce qui se passe si un client demande le mode passif, mais le serveur ne connaissez pas l'adresse IP externe du routeur NAT. Ainsi, le serveur envoie son adresse interne pour le client. Dans ce cas, deux choses peuvent se produire:
+
Assume a server is behind a NAT router. Imagine what happens if a client requests passive mode but the server does not know the external IP address of the NAT router. So the server sends its internal address to the client. In that case two things could happen:
* Si le client n'est pas derrière un NAT, le client serait avorter depuis l'adresse n'est pas valide.
+
* If the client is not behind a NAT, client would abort since address is invalid.
* Si le client est derrière un NAT, l'adresse donnée par le serveur peut être le même que dans un système propre réseau local du client.
+
* If client is behind a NAT, the address given by the server might be the same as a system in the client's own LAN.
De toute évidence, dans les deux cas le mode passif serait impossible.
+
Obviously, in both cases passive mode would be impossible.
  
Donc, si un serveur est derrière un routeur NAT, il faut connaître l'adresse IP externe du routeur en mode passif. Dans ce cas, le serveur envoie l'adresse externe du routeur pour le client. Le client établit alors une connexion vers le routeur NAT, qui, dans les routes tourner la connexion au serveur.
+
So if a server is behind a NAT router, it needs to know the external IP address of the router in passive mode. In that case, the server sends the router's external address to the client. The client then establishes a connection to the NAT router, which in turn routes the connection to the server.
  
Firewalls === ===
+
=== Firewalls ===
  
Le but d'un''''Personal Firewall est de protéger l'utilisateur contre les vulnérabilités de sécurité dans le système d'exploitation ou les applications tournant sur elle. Sur Internet, les logiciels malveillants comme les vers par exemple essayer d'exploiter ces failles pour infecter votre système. Les pare-feu peut aider à prévenir une telle infection.
+
The purpose of a ''Personal Firewall'' is to protect the user from security vulnerabilities in the operating system or the applications running on it. Over the internet, malware like for example worms try to exploit these flaws to infect your system. Firewalls can help to prevent such an infection.
  
Surtout si vous utilisez FTP, les utilisateurs de pare-feu peut parfois voir des messages comme celui-ci de leur pare-feu:
+
Especially if using FTP, firewall users might sometimes see messages like this from their firewall:
 Trojan Netbus bloqués sur le port 12345 utilisé par FileZilla.exe
+
Trojan Netbus blocked on port 12345 used by FileZilla.exe
  
Dans presque tous les cas, il s'agit d'une'''''fausses alarmes. N'importe quel programme peut choisir n'importe quel port il veut pour la communication sur Internet. Il peut donc arriver que FileZilla arrive de choisir un port qui est d'ailleurs le port par défaut d'un trojan ou d'un autre malware. Tant que vous téléchargez FileZilla sur le site officiel, il est propre de tout malware.
+
In almost all cases, this is a '''false alarm'''. Any program can choose any port it wants for communication over the internet. So it can happen that FileZilla happens to choose a port that is incidentally the default port of a trojan or some other malware. As long as you download FileZilla from the official website, it is clean of any malware.
  
=== Malveillants routeurs, pare-feu et le sabotage de données ===
+
=== Malicious routers, firewalls and data sabotage ===
  
Certains routeurs et pare-feu semblant d'être intelligent. Ils analysent les connexions et si ils pensent que c'est FTP, ils silencieusement changer les données échangées entre le client et le serveur. Si l'utilisateur n'a pas explicitement activé cette fonctionnalité, ce problème n'est rien d'autre que le sabotage de données et peut causer divers problèmes.
+
Some routers and firewalls pretend to be smart. They analyze the connections and if they think it is FTP, they silently change the data exchanged between client and server. If the user has not explicitly enabled this feature, this behavior is nothing else than data sabotage and can cause various problems.
  
Pour illustrer par un exemple, supposons qu'il existe un client derrière un routeur NAT tente de se connecter au serveur. Let's supposons en outre que ce client ne sait pas qu'il est derrière un NAT et veut utiliser le mode actif. Ainsi, il envoie la commande PORT avec son local, l'adresse IP non routable sur le serveur:
+
To illustrate with an example, assume there is a client behind a NAT router trying to connect to the server. Let's further assume that this client does not know it is behind a NAT and wants to use active mode. So it sends the PORT command with his local, unroutable IP address to the server:
  
 PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34
+
PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34
  
La commande ci-dessus indique au serveur de se connecter à l'adresse 10.0.0.1 sur le port 12 * 256 = 3106 34
+
The above command tells the server to connect to the address 10.0.0.1 on port 12*256+34 = 3106
  
Le routeur NAT voit dans cette évolution et en silence la commande à inclure l'adresse IP externe. Dans le même temps, le routeur NAT va également créer une redirection de port temporaire pour la session FTP, éventuellement sur un autre port même:
+
The NAT router sees this and silently changes the command to include the external IP address. At the same time, the NAT router will also create a temporary port forwarding for the FTP session, possibly on a different port even:
  
 PORT 123,123,123,123,24,55
+
PORT 123,123,123,123,24,55
  
Maintenant, la commande ci-dessus indique au serveur de se connecter à l'adresse 123.123.123.123 sur le port 24 * 256 = 6199 55
+
Now the above command tells the server to connect to the address 123.123.123.123 on port 24*256+55 = 6199
  
Avec ce comportement, un routeur NAT permet à un client mal configuré pour utiliser le mode actif.
+
With this behavior, a NAT router allows an improperly configured client to use active mode.
  
Mais pourquoi est-ce mauvais? Si cette fonctionnalité est activée par défaut, sans le consentement explicite de l'utilisateur, il provoque beaucoup de problèmes. les connexions FTP dans sa forme la plus fondamentale semble fonctionner, mais dès qu'il ya un certain écart de l'affaire de base, tout va échouer, laissant l'utilisateur totalement déconcerté:
+
But why is this bad? If this feature is enabled by default, without explicit user consent, it causes lots of problems. FTP connections in its most basic form appear to work, but as soon as there's some deviation from the basic case, everything will fail, leaving the user totally stumped:
  
* Le routeur NAT prend aveuglément certaines utilisations de connexion FTP en fonction de critères tels que les ports cible ou la réponse initiale du serveur:
+
* The NAT router blindly assumes some connection uses FTP based on criteria like target ports or the initial server response:
** Il n'y a aucune garantie que le protocole utilisé est vraiment FTP, mais il est détecté en tant que telle (également appelé''faux''positive). Bien que peu probable, il est concevable que dans une future révision du protocole FTP, la syntaxe de la commande PORT pourrait changer. Un routeur NAT modifier la commande PORT serait silencieusement changer les choses il ne supporte pas et donc rompre la liaison.
+
** There is no guarantee that the used protocol really is FTP, yet it is detected as such (also called ''false positive''). Though unlikely, it is conceivable that in a future revision of the FTP protocol, the syntax of the PORT command might change. A NAT router modifying the PORT command would silently change things it does not support and thus break the connection.
** Détection de protocole du routeur peut manquer de reconnaître une connexion FTP (un''faux''négatif). Supposons que le routeur ne regarde que le port cible, et si elle est de 21, il le détecte comme FTP. À ce titre, les connexions en mode actif avec un client mal configuré pour serveurs sur le port 21 va fonctionner, mais les connexions aux autres serveurs sur des ports non standards échouera.
+
** The router's protocol detection can fail to recognize an FTP connection (a ''false negative''). Let's assume the router only looks at the target port, and if it is 21, it detects it as FTP. As such, active mode connections with an improperly configured client to servers running on port 21 will work, but connections to other servers on non-standard ports will fail.
* De toute évidence, un routeur NAT ne peut plus toucher à la connexion dès que une session cryptée FTP est utilisé, à nouveau en laissant l'utilisateur clueless pourquoi il travaille pour FTP normal, mais pas pour cryptée FTP.
+
* Obviously, a NAT router can no longer tamper with the connection as soon as an encrypted FTP session is used, again leaving the user clueless why it works for normal FTP but not for encrypted FTP.
* Supposons un client derrière un routeur NAT envoie "PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34". Comment fonctionne le routeur NAT de connaissance du client est mal configuré? Il est également possible que le client est correctement configuré, mais veut simplement d'ouvrir une FXP (serveur à serveur) de transfert entre le serveur est connecté à une autre machine et dans le propre réseau local du serveur.
+
* Assume a client behind a NAT router sends "PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34". How does the NAT router know the client is improperly configured? It is also possible that the client is properly configured, yet merely wants to initiate an FXP (server-to-server) transfer between the server it is connected to and another machine in the server's own local network.
  
Comme vous pouvez le voir, ayant des caractéristiques spécifiques du protocole est activé dans un routeur NAT par défaut est une mauvaise chose. Un routeur NAT bonne devraient toujours être pleinement protocole agnostique. L'exception est si vous en tant qu'utilisateur ont explicitement activé cette fonctionnalité, sachant toutes ses conséquences.
+
As you can see, having protocol specific features enabled in a NAT router by default is a bad thing. A good NAT router should always be fully protocol-agnostic. The exception is if you as user have explicitly enabled this feature, knowing all its consequences.
  
Bien que cette section seulement discuté de la combinaison d'un routeur NAT sur le côté client en mode actif, la même chose s'applique à un serveur derrière un routeur NAT et la réponse à la commande PASV.
+
While this section only discussed the combination of a NAT router on the client side with active mode, the same applies to a server behind a NAT router and the reply to the PASV command.
  
 
== Setting up FileZilla Client ==
 
== Setting up FileZilla Client ==

Revision as of 22:30, 7 May 2010

Setting up network components for FTP is not trivial for use outside your LAN (Local Area Network). Since so many firewalls and routers exist, it is impractical to give detailed step-by-step instructions suitable for every user. To configure FileZilla and the routers and/or firewalls involved, it is important to understand the basics of the FTP protocol. This documentation describes the history of the FTP protocol and how some aspects of the protocol work. Read it carefully, it will save you a lot of trouble setting up FTP.

Background

An overview of the historical and technical background of the FTP protocol. For detailed in-depth information see specifications.

Historical Background

In the fast living world of the internet, the File Transfer Protocol is not just old, it's ancient. Early drafts of the protocol go back as far as 1971, with the current specifications being from 1985. The protocol might even be older than you!

Back then, the Internet was mainly used by universities and research centers. The community was small, many users knew each other and all were collaborating together. The internet was a friendly, trusting place. Security was not a concern.

Since then, a lot has changed. The Internet is now ubiquitous, with millions of users communicating with each other in many different ways. The internet is now a hostile place. The availability and openness has attracted malicious users who exploit design limitations, incomplete implementations, bugs and the inexperience of other users. A well-known software company located in Redmond, WA certainly played a part in this.

Several attempts have been made to address these problems:

  • NAT (Network Address Translation) routers. Many of the hosts and routers on the internet use the IPv4 protocol. The number of hosts connected to the internet is reaching IPV4's design limit for the number of addresses(IPv6 is designed to relieve this). NAT routers allow multiple systems within a LAN to connect to the outside world with one external IP address.
  • Personal firewalls try to protect personal computers from attacks by malicious users.

Unfortunately, both NAT and personal firewalls conflict with FTP more often than not. To make things worse, some of them even have flaws themselves, causing additional problems regarding FTP.

Technical background

What distinguishes FTP from most other protocols is the use of secondary connections for file transfers. If you connect to an FTP server, you establish the so-called control connection, over which the FTP commands and their replies are transferred. In order to transfer a file or a directory listing, the client sends some command over the control connection to establish the data connection.

This data connection can be established in two different ways, called active mode and passive mode.

In passive mode, which is the recommended mode, the client sends the PASV command to the server, and the server responds with an address. The client then issues a command to transfer a file or to get a directory listing and establishes a secondary connection to the address returned by the server.

In active mode, the client opens a socket on the local machine, and tells its address to the server using the PORT command. Once the client issues a command to transfer a file or listing, the server will connect to the address provided by the client.

In both cases, the actual file or listing is then transferred over the data connection.

In general, establishing outgoing connections requires less configuration on the routers/firewalls involved than establishing incoming connections. In passive mode, the connection is outgoing on the client side and incoming on the server side. In active mode however, the roles are reversed: The data connection is incoming on the client side and outgoing on the server side. Please note that this only makes a difference for connection establishment: Once the data connection gets established it can be used for either up- or downloads.

A common network setup might look like this:

FTP1.png


So in passive mode, the router and firewall on the server side need to be configured to accept and forward incoming connections. On the client side however, only outgoing connections have to be allowed, which will already be the case most of the time.

Analogous in active mode, the router and firewall on the client side need to be configured to accept and forward incoming connections. Apparently on the server side, only outgoing connections have to be allowed.

Since usually one server provides a service for many users, it is far easier to just configure the router and firewall on the server side once for passive mode, than to configure the client's router/firewall for each individual client in active mode. That is why passive mode is recommended.

NAT routers

For most broadband users, there will be a NAT (Network Address Translation) router between their computer and the internet. This NAT router may be a standalone router device (perhaps a wireless router), or it could be built into a DSL modem or Cable modem. In a NAT environment, all systems behind the NAT router form a Local Area Network (LAN) and each system in the LAN has a local IP address (recognizable as four small numbers separated by dots). The NAT router itself has a local IP address as well. In addition to that, the NAT router also has an external IP address under which it is known to the internet. The internal IP addresses are only valid inside the LAN, for a remote system they would make no sense. Example:

FTP2.png


Assume a server is behind a NAT router. Imagine what happens if a client requests passive mode but the server does not know the external IP address of the NAT router. So the server sends its internal address to the client. In that case two things could happen:

  • If the client is not behind a NAT, client would abort since address is invalid.
  • If client is behind a NAT, the address given by the server might be the same as a system in the client's own LAN.

Obviously, in both cases passive mode would be impossible.

So if a server is behind a NAT router, it needs to know the external IP address of the router in passive mode. In that case, the server sends the router's external address to the client. The client then establishes a connection to the NAT router, which in turn routes the connection to the server.

Firewalls

The purpose of a Personal Firewall is to protect the user from security vulnerabilities in the operating system or the applications running on it. Over the internet, malware like for example worms try to exploit these flaws to infect your system. Firewalls can help to prevent such an infection.

Especially if using FTP, firewall users might sometimes see messages like this from their firewall:

Trojan Netbus blocked on port 12345 used by FileZilla.exe

In almost all cases, this is a false alarm. Any program can choose any port it wants for communication over the internet. So it can happen that FileZilla happens to choose a port that is incidentally the default port of a trojan or some other malware. As long as you download FileZilla from the official website, it is clean of any malware.

Malicious routers, firewalls and data sabotage

Some routers and firewalls pretend to be smart. They analyze the connections and if they think it is FTP, they silently change the data exchanged between client and server. If the user has not explicitly enabled this feature, this behavior is nothing else than data sabotage and can cause various problems.

To illustrate with an example, assume there is a client behind a NAT router trying to connect to the server. Let's further assume that this client does not know it is behind a NAT and wants to use active mode. So it sends the PORT command with his local, unroutable IP address to the server:

PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34

The above command tells the server to connect to the address 10.0.0.1 on port 12*256+34 = 3106

The NAT router sees this and silently changes the command to include the external IP address. At the same time, the NAT router will also create a temporary port forwarding for the FTP session, possibly on a different port even:

PORT 123,123,123,123,24,55

Now the above command tells the server to connect to the address 123.123.123.123 on port 24*256+55 = 6199

With this behavior, a NAT router allows an improperly configured client to use active mode.

But why is this bad? If this feature is enabled by default, without explicit user consent, it causes lots of problems. FTP connections in its most basic form appear to work, but as soon as there's some deviation from the basic case, everything will fail, leaving the user totally stumped:

  • The NAT router blindly assumes some connection uses FTP based on criteria like target ports or the initial server response:
    • There is no guarantee that the used protocol really is FTP, yet it is detected as such (also called false positive). Though unlikely, it is conceivable that in a future revision of the FTP protocol, the syntax of the PORT command might change. A NAT router modifying the PORT command would silently change things it does not support and thus break the connection.
    • The router's protocol detection can fail to recognize an FTP connection (a false negative). Let's assume the router only looks at the target port, and if it is 21, it detects it as FTP. As such, active mode connections with an improperly configured client to servers running on port 21 will work, but connections to other servers on non-standard ports will fail.
  • Obviously, a NAT router can no longer tamper with the connection as soon as an encrypted FTP session is used, again leaving the user clueless why it works for normal FTP but not for encrypted FTP.
  • Assume a client behind a NAT router sends "PORT 10,0,0,1,12,34". How does the NAT router know the client is improperly configured? It is also possible that the client is properly configured, yet merely wants to initiate an FXP (server-to-server) transfer between the server it is connected to and another machine in the server's own local network.

As you can see, having protocol specific features enabled in a NAT router by default is a bad thing. A good NAT router should always be fully protocol-agnostic. The exception is if you as user have explicitly enabled this feature, knowing all its consequences.

While this section only discussed the combination of a NAT router on the client side with active mode, the same applies to a server behind a NAT router and the reply to the PASV command.

Setting up FileZilla Client

In case you're running FileZilla 3, it's recommended you run the network configuration wizard. It will guide you through the necessary steps and can test your configuration in the end.

Obviously, if you want to connect to any server, you need to tell your firewall that FileZilla should be allowed to open connections to other servers. Most normal FTP servers use port 21, SFTP servers use port 22 and FTP over SSL/TLS (implicit mode) use port 990 by default. These ports are not mandatory though, so it's best to allow outgoing connections to arbitrary remote ports.

Since there are many servers on the internet that are misconfigured and don't support both transfer modes, it's recommended that you configure both transfer modes on your end.

Passive mode

The client has no control over what port the server chooses for the data connection in passive mode, so in order to use passive mode, you'll have to allow outgoing connections to all ports in your firewall.

Active mode

In active mode, the client opens a socket and waits for the server to establish the transfer connection.

By default, FileZilla Client asks the operating system for the machine's IP address and for a free port number. This configuration can only work if you are connected to the internet directly without any NAT router and if you have set your firewall to allow incoming connections on all ports greater than 1024.

If you have a NAT router, you need to tell FileZilla your external IP address or active mode connections will not work with servers outside your local network:

  • If you have a fixed external IP address, you can enter it in the configuration dialog of FileZilla.
  • If you have a dynamic IP address, you can let FileZilla obtain your external IP address from a special website automatically each time you start FileZilla. No matter what version of FileZilla you have, no information will be submitted to that website.

If in doubt, use the second option.

If you do not want to allow incoming connections on all ports, or if you have a NAT router, you need to tell FileZilla to use a specific range of ports for active mode connections. You will have to open these ports in your firewall. If you have a NAT router, you need to forward these ports to the local machine FileZilla is installed on. Depending on your router model, you can either forward a range of ports or you need to forward all ports individually.

Valid ports can be from 1 to 65535, however ports less than 1024 are reserved for other protocols. It is best to choose ports greater than or equal to 50000 for active mode FTP. Due to the nature of TCP (the underlying transport protocol), a port cannot be reused immediately after each connection. Hence the range of ports should not be too small or transfers of multiple small files can fail. A range of 50 ports should be sufficient in most cases.

Screenshot of settings dialog of FileZilla 3 showing configuration page for active mode.

Setting up FileZilla Server

Setting up the server is very similar to setting up the client, the main difference is that the roles of active and passive mode are reversed.

One common mistake done especially from users with NAT routers is the way they test the server. If you are within your local network, you can only test using the local IP address of the server. Using the external address from the inside will probably fail. Basically one of the following could happen if you try to connect using the external address from the inside:

  • It surprisingly works
  • Router blocks access to its own external address from the inside as possible attack
  • Router forwards connection to your ISP which then blocks it as possible attack

Even if that works, there is no guarantee an external user can really connect to your server and transfer files. The only reliable way is to connect to your server from an external system outside of your LAN.

Active mode

Just make sure FileZilla Server is allowed to establish outgoing connections to arbitrary ports, since the client controls which port to use.

For the local end of the connection, FileZilla Server tries to use a port one less than that of the control connection (e.g. port 20 if server is listening on port 21). However this is not always possible, so don't rely on it.

Passive mode

Server configuration is very similar to client configuration for active mode.

In passive mode, the server opens a socket and waits for the client to connect to it.

By default, FileZilla Server asks the operating system for the machine's IP address and for a free port number. This configuration can only work if you are connected to the internet directly without any NAT router and if you have set your firewall to allow incoming connections on all ports greater than 1024.

If you have a NAT router, you need to tell FileZilla Server your external IP address or passive mode connections will not work with clients outside your local network:

  • If you have a fixed external IP address, you can enter it in the configuration dialog of FileZilla Server.
  • If you have a dynamic IP address, you can let FileZilla Server obtain your external IP address from a special website automatically. Except your version of FileZilla Server, no information will be submitted to that website.

If in doubt, use the second option.

If you do not want to allow incoming connections on all ports, or if you have a NAT router, you need to tell FileZilla Server to use a specific range of ports for passive mode connections. You will have to open these ports in your firewall. If you have a NAT router, you need to forward these ports to the local machine FileZilla Server is installed on. Depending on your router model, you can either forward a range of ports or you need to forward all ports individually.

Valid ports can be from 1 to 65535, however ports less than 1024 are reserved for other protocols. It is best to choose ports >= 50000 for passive mode FTP. Due to the nature of TCP (the underlying transport protocol), a port cannot be reused immediately after each connection. Hence the range of ports should not be too small or transfers of multiple small files can fail. A range of 50 ports should be sufficient in most cases.

Screenshot of settings dialog of FileZilla Server showing configuration page for passive mode.

Troubleshooting

Unfortunately, many personal firewalls and consumer routers are flawed or in some cases, are even actively sabotaging FTP (e.g. SMC Barricade V1.2).

First of all, you should keep everything up-to-date. This includes the firewall software as well as the firmware version in your router.

If that does not help, you might want to try to uninstall your firewall to see what happens. Simply disabling your firewall might not work, as some firewalls cannot be fully disabled.

If possible, try to connect directly to the internet without a router.

If you are trying to setup a server and it works fine within your LAN but is not reachable from the outside, try changing the listening port. Some ISPs don't like its customers to host servers and block ports < 1024.

Another problem might be if you are hosting an FTP server on default port 21. There might be a firewall at the ISP side of your connection which can do odd things like changing the port for PASV commands. Try using another non-default port for your FTP server.

If you encounter "cannot open data connection" on a random basis, i.e. the ftp client can connect to the ftp server without problem for many connections until it encounters this problem, one possible reason may be your client PC anti-virus scanner being configured to block outgoing connections on certain ranges of ports. When your ftp connections are running on pasv mode, the client side outgoing ports are selected randomly and when it hits those prohibited ports, you will encounter your problem. To identify this problem, read your anti-virus log on that client. In general, any software e.g. PC firewall, etc that can block certain range of outgoing ports can cause similar ftp grief.

Timeouts on large files

If you can transfer small files just fine, but transfers of larger files end with a timeout, then there is a broken router and/or firewall between the client and the server that is causing this problem.

As mentioned above, FTP uses two TCP connections: One control connection to submit commands and to receive replies as well as one data connection for the actual file transfers. It is the nature of FTP that during a transfer the control connection stays completely idle.

The TCP specifications do not set a limit on the amount of time a connection can stay idle. Unless explicitly closed a connection is assumed to remain alive indefinitely. Many routers and firewalls however automatically close idle connections after a while. Worse, they most of the time don't even notify the endpoints of this, instead they just silently drop the connection. So for FTP this means that during a long transfer the control connection can get dropped, but neither client nor server get to know about it. So when all data has been transferred, the server still thinks the control connection is alive and sends the transfer confirmation reply over the control connection. Likewise, the client as well thinks the control connection is alive and waits for the reply from the server. But since the control connection got silently dropped, this reply never arrives, eventually causing a timeout.

In an attempt to solve this problem, the TCP specifications include a way to send keep-alive packets on otherwise idle TCP connections, to tell all involved parties that the connection is still alive and needed. However, the TCP specifications also make it very clear that these keep-alive packets should not be sent more often than once every two hours. Thus, with added tolerance for network latency, connections can stay idle for up to 2 hours and 4 minutes.

The problem is that many routers and firewalls drop connections that have been idle for less than 2 hours and 4 minutes. Such behavior is violating the TCP specifications, RFC 5382 makes this very clear. In other words, all routers and firewalls that are dropping idle connections too early are broken, they just cannot be used for long FTP transfers. Unfortunately manufacturers of consumer-grade router and firewall vendors do not care about specifications, all they care about is getting your money and thus only deliver barely working lowest quality junk.

To solve this problem you need to uninstall any affected firewall and replace any faulty router with a quality one.

Setting up FileZilla Server with Windows Firewall

If you are having problems with setting up FileZilla Server to run behind Windows Firewall (specifically, it fails on "List" and the client receives a "Failed to receive directory listing" error), you must add the FileZilla Server application to Windows Firewall's Exceptions list. To do this, follow these steps:

  1. Open Windows Firewall under Control Panel.
  2. If using Vista, click "Change Settings"
  3. Select the "Exceptions" tab.
  4. Click "Add program..."
  5. Do NOT select "FileZilla Server Interface" from the list, instead click on "Browse..."
  6. Locate the directory you installed FileZilla Server to (normally "C:\Program Files\FileZilla Server\")
  7. Double click or select "FileZilla server.exe" and press open (Once again, NOT "FileZilla Server Interface.exe")
  8. Select "FileZilla server.exe" from the list and click "Ok"
  9. Verify that "FileZilla server.exe" is added to the exceptions list and that it has a check mark in the box next to it
  10. Press "Ok" to close the window

Passive mode should now work. If you are still having problems connecting (from another computer or outside the network) check your router settings or try to add the port number in the Windows Firewall settings located in the Exceptions tab.

See the Microsoft kb article 931130 about running FileZilla with the "Routing and Remote Access" or the "Application Layer Gateway" service enabled. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931130